The purpose of this study is to examine young consumers’ purchase intention of refurbished electronic devices (REDs) such as laptop, tablet, mobile phone and game console. From literature review the factors that influence purchase intention were identified and used in a survey study as independent variables. From an analysis of the correlation of the factors with purchase intention their relative importance was established which can be used to develop attractive value propositions and business models for REDS for young consumers.
e-waste, refurbished electronic devices, young consumer, purchase intention, business model.
Electronic and electrical waste (e-waste) is one of the fastest-growing waste streams in the world (United Nations, 2020). In this paper young consumers’ purchase intention of refurbished electronic devices (REDs) such as laptop, tablet, mobile phone and game console is studied. The aim is to support the development of new propositions and business models for REDs that contribute to achieving a circular economy (CE). Although it is widely recognized that studying consumer behaviour regarding REDs is central to successful electronic waste management (Islam et al., 2021; Kumar, 2019), there is not enough understanding in the academic literature about factors that could influence young consumers’ purchase intention of REDs. This study addressed this limitation by focusing on young Dutch consumers aged 18-25 years.
In this study, we were focused on the factors influencing young consumer’s attitude toward their intention to purchase refurbished electronic products. Since limited research has been done in this area specifically targeting the young consumers, therefore, when reviewing relevant literature, we can only review the past literature which focuses on
consumer behaviour toward e-waste (Islam et al, 2021) and mobile phone recycling (Yin et al, 2014)
consumers’ perceptions of seller reputation, distribution and buying intention of refurbished products (Agostini et al, 2021)
consumers’ perceptions of buying refurbished smartphones (Nasiri & Shokouhyar, 2021), and
residents’ perceptions and behaviour of e-waste recycling (Akhtar et al, 2014; Nguyen et al, 2019).
A research study performed by Nasiri and Shokouhyar (2021) investigates the significant factors in consumer perceived value about purchasing refurbished mobile phones. Nasiri and Shokouhyar (2021) implied that the attractiveness of owning a refurbished mobile phone is positively related to the user’s green perception. Research conducted by Yin and his colleagues focusing on Chinese consumers’ behaviour of waste mobile phone reviewed that when consumers’ level of environmental awareness was low, they will be less likely to concern about e-waste recycling or purchasing any used mobile phones (Yin et al., 2014).
A quantitative research project supervised by Nguyen and his colleagues in Vietnam reviewed that citizens with high environmental awareness tend to be more active in e-waste recycling and reduction initiative. In other words, it shouldn’t be surprised to claim that these citizens are also more comfortable with e-waste product. Furthermore, these citizens are willing to accept e-waste product “because they understand that such behaviour contributes to save natural resources and eliminate the environmental problem” (Nguyen et al., 2019, p. 19). Aktar et al. (2014) offers a similar view by pointing out that consumers are more “willing to purchase refurbished or environmentally friendly product to reduce the impact of e-waste on environment”. (p. 38).
An empirical study conducted by Agostini and his colleagues examined the young consumers’ perceptions of seller reputation, distribution and intention to purchase refurbished mobile phones in Italy. Their findings reviewed that most of the young consumers “have a favourable attitude towards purchasing refurbished smartphones” (Agostini et al., 2021, p.6). Other than that, many users of refurbished mobile phones claimed that they will encourage their relatives and friends to buy refurbished phones (Agostini et al., 2021).
Both Islam et al. and Nguyen et al. offer their comparable views to the above statement. While recommendations from friends and family members is always an important factor behind purchase decisions (Islam et al., 2021), social pressure and acceptance always had a positive impact on e-waste recycling which might lead to accepting of e-waste products (Nguyen et al., 2019).
Many researchers argued that both reputation of seller and location convenience are the two main factors positively affect attitude and the intention to purchase refurbished products (Agostini et al., 2021; Yin et al., 2014). Agostini et al. (2021) further explained that it is important that refurbished smartphone can be easily accessible by the potential buyers. Hence, any sellers of refurbished mobile phones should consider distributing their products in more channels.
In a simple term, inconvenience or the nonavailability may have negative impacts on consumer willingness and intention to adapt REDs. Nguyen and his colleagues supported the above statement and argued that inconvenience plays a weak impact on the behavioural intention of accepting any recycled and REDs (Nguyen et al., 2019).
As pointed out by Yin et al. (2014), only about 12.4% or used mobile phones were sold by the second-hand market for reuse. These used phones are particularly popular among the customers within rural areas after reassembly or refurbishment (Yin et al., 2014). In brief, the refurbished mobile phone can always attract many customers in rural areas who cannot afford or unwilling to purchase a brand-new phone. In a same vein, Islam et al. (2021) noted that “Consumers prefer to buy cheap (nonbrand) electronics, despite a shorter lifespan” (p. 11).
While lower prices are the main reason and motivation for purchasing REDs (Nasiri and Shokouhyar, 2021), perceive of value is another factor which could encourage customers in buying REDs. As pointed out by Agostini et al. (2021), many refurbished mobile phones buyers agreed that “acquiring a refurbished smartphone meets both my quality and price requirement” (p. 6).
In summary, environmental awareness can lead to the purchase of REDs because consumers are becoming increasingly concerned about the impact of e-waste on the environment, they want to reduce their impact on the environment, it can be a more financially sustainable option, and it can have a positive impact on the environment. By choosing to purchase refurbished electronics, consumers can contribute to a more sustainable future while also saving money and reducing their overall consumption.
The literature review has helped us to discover four main factors, ‘environmental awareness’, ‘social acceptance’, ‘seller/brand reputation and availability’, and ‘affordability and value’ that could influence individuals in accepting the idea of considering a refurbished product. These factors (which then turn into variables for the current research) had widely been studied in different countries and contexts but not in the Netherlands. This research aims to analyze these variables quantitatively among young consumers in the Netherlands. A research model is developed based on these factors (see Figure 1).
The main goal is to understand the association between identified factors and purchase intention of REDs. The hypotheses are developed as below: when it comes to young consumers in the Netherlands, there is an association between their perceptions of likeliness to purchase refurbished electronic devices in the near future and their perceptions of
.. the overall environmental awareness (Hypothesis H1). These young consumers believe that recycling of electronic devices can improve the quality of the environment (H1a) and create a better living environment (H1b). They also believe that everyone (H1d) including themself (H1c) must be willing to change their lifestyle to reduce the damage they have caused to the environment. Other than that, they believe in giving old electronic devices a second life is a great way to respect the environment (H1e) and acquiring REDs is everyone’s responsibility to reduce the volume of e-waste generated (H1f).
.. the social acceptance of these devices (Hypothesis H2). These young consumers believe that if their family and friends were buying REDs, they will also engage in it (H2a). They also believe that those who are important to them will influence (H2b) and support (H2c) them to buy REDs. Additionally, these young consumers believe that the community where they live (H2d), the media (H2e) and the government policies (H2f) could as well influence them in buying REDs.
.. the importance of seller reputation as well as the availability of the product (Hypothesis H3). These young consumers believe that itis important for the seller (H3a) or manufacturer (H3c) to have a good reputation as well as offering good services (H3b). It is also important for them that the seller has a reputation for being fair in its relationship with its customers (H3d). Other than that, it is also important for these young consumers that these devices are widely available (H3e) and can be purchased online (H3f).
.. the affordability and value of these devices (Hypothesis H4). These young consumers believe that refurbished electronic device is cheaper (H4a) and more affordable (H4b) than a brand new one. Additionally, price is always a major consideration when they make a purchase decision of any electronic devices (H4c). They also believe that they are getting good value for the money they spend (H4d). Lastly, they believe acquiring a refurbished electronic device meets both their quality and price requirement (H4e).
A descriptive research design was suitable for this study as it frequently uses data collection methods such as questionnaire survey that involves “asking respondents structured questions about what they think, feel and do” (Hair, et al., 2021, p. 109). Data was collected from primary sources through a structured questionnaire survey. The questionnaire was adopted, modified and localized from multiple studies done by Agostini et al. (2021); Akhtar et al. (2014); Nasiri and Shokouhyar (2021), Nguyen et al. (2019) and Yin et al. (2014). It consists of 29 questions that assess research variables. Five questions are in relation to the demographic aspects by selecting multiple choices; one question is based on the purchase intention of the refurbished electronic devices (dependent variable) and the rest of the questions (23) are based on the ‘environmental awareness’, ‘social acceptance’, ‘seller/brand reputation and availability’, and ‘affordability and value’ (independent variables of the study). Except the demographic questions, all questions are designed according to the five-point Likert scale for example, how strongly subjects agree or disagree with the statements (1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree).
To improve the reliability of the research instruments, we employed content and face validity by randomly inviting several undergraduate students (a.k.a. young consumer) from different Dutch universities to judge the preliminary questionnaire followed by providing reviews and enhancements on the content of the questionnaire. These processes allow us (the researchers) to improve our questionnaire to be valid regarding its content (Hair et al., 2021).
The survey was administered from March 6 to March 31, 2023, through mall-intercept approach. Target respondents were intercepted in the main entrances of two Saxion campuses in Enschede and Deventer in-order to reach a large segment of the population. The process involved randomly intercepting the students, screening them for appropriateness, and inviting them to complete the paper-based survey on the sport.
The collected data was analysed using IBM’s SPSS statistics software, version 28. In addition to descriptive statistics, the Pearson correlation coefficient test were also used to interpret the data, which came from 172 completed surveys over the 4-week data collection period.
The demographic questions asked respondents to state their gender, age, their highest level of education they have completed, their income and if they have ever purchased any REDs in the past. The results showed that almost all respondents (90.1%) were between 18-24 years of age. Gender of respondents was slightly unevenly distributed, with 54.1% indicated for female, 41.9% male and 2.9% preferred not to answer to this question. More than 69% of the young respondents stated that they have completed their secondary education followed by 28.5% that indicated that they have completed either an associate or bachelor’s degrees, respectively. In terms of net income per month, the majority of the respondents (over 84.9%) claimed that their income is less than €1000 per month. For the question of whether they have ever purchased any REDs in the past, over 49% of the respondents claimed that they have never bought any REDs previously.
Respondents were asked to indicate their level of agreement with the statements as shown in Table 1 . The intention of these questions was to establish young consumers’ viewpoint of buying REDs. Although not all the respondents will buy REDs in the near future (Q1 mean is 3.20), most of them indicated that recycling of electronic devices will improve and create a better living environment hence, everyone should change our lifestyle to reduce the damage we have caused to the environment (H1a-d). However, many respondents claimed that they are not influenced by the external environmental factors (such as friends, media, government policies, etc.) in considering buying REDs (H2a-f).
In response to questions regarding seller/brand reputation and availability of the product, the young consumers pointed out that it is important to them that the seller (or manufacturer brand) has a good reputation and being fair in its relationship with its customers. Also, they claimed that when shopping for any REDs, it is important for them that these devices can be bought online (H3a-e). Lastly, while price might not be the most important consideration when they make a purchase decision of any electronic devices (H4c mean is 3.38), many of these young consumers claimed that acquiring a refurbished electronic device meets both their quality and price requirement (H4e mean is 3.41).
Table : Young Dutch consumers' purchase intention of reds*
No. | Statement | Mean | SD | r | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | I am likely to purchase refurbished electronic devices in the near future. | 3.20 | 1.087 | ||
H1a | Recycling of electronic devices improves the quality of the environment | 4.16 | .596 | 0.230 | <.005 |
H1b | Recycling of electronic devices is useful to create a better living environment | 3.96 | .760 | 0.201 | <.05 |
H1c | I am willing to change my lifestyle to reduce the damage I cause to the environment | 3.54 | .881 | 0.227 | <.005 |
H1d | Everyone must be willing to change our lifestyle to reduce the damage we cause to the environment | 3.42 | 1.015 | 0.171 | <.05 |
H1e | Giving old electronic devices a second life is a great way to respect the environment | 4.21 | .782 | 0.115 | <.05 |
H1f | Acquiring refurbished electronic devices is everyone’s responsibility to reduce the volume of e-waste generated | 3.35 | .842 | 0.304 | <.001 |
H2a | If my family and friends were buying refurbished electronic devices, I will also engage in it. | 3.35 | 1.052 | 0.495 | <.001 |
H2b | Those who have important influences on me (such as my boss and teachers) think that I should buy refurbished electronic devices. | 2.63 | .992 | 0.347 | <.001 |
H2c | Those who are important to me (such as families and friends) support me to buy refurbished electronic devices. | 3.08 | .994 | 0.396 | <.001 |
H2d | The community where I live could influence me in buying refurbished electronic devices. | 3.12 | .975 | 0.391 | <.001 |
H2e | The media influences me in buying refurbished electronic devices. | 2.63 | 1.015 | 0.090 | .239 |
H2f | The government policies influence me in buying refurbished electronic devices. | 2.39 | 1.029 | 0.075 | .327 |
H3a | When shopping for any refurbished electronic devices, it is important for me that the seller has a good reputation. | 4.27 | .864 | 0.272 | <0.001 |
H3b | When shopping for any refurbished electronic devices, it is important for me that the seller has a reputation for offering good services. | 4.30 | .803 | 0.137 | .073 |
H3c | When shopping for any refurbished electronic devices, it is important for me that the manufacturer brand has a good reputation. | 4.12 | .815 | 0.105 | .170 |
H3d | When shopping for any refurbished electronic devices, it is important for me that the seller has a reputation for being fair in its relationship with its customers. | 4.27 | .779 | 0.101 | .187 |
H3e | When shopping for any refurbished electronic devices, it is important for me that these devices are widely available. | 3.68 | .877 | 0.069 | .370 |
H3f | When shopping for any refurbished electronic devices, it is important for me that these devices can be bought online. | 3.74 | 1.005 | -0.048 | .528 |
H4a | I rather purchase a refurbished electronic device since it is cheaper than a brand new one. | 3.45 | 1.110 | 0.545 | <.001 |
H4b | I choose a refurbished electronic device mainly because I cannot afford a brand new one. | 2.73 | 1.185 | 0.257 | <.001 |
H4c | Price is always the most important consideration when I make a purchase decision of any electronic devices. | 3.38 | 1.050 | 0.271 | <.001 |
H4d | If I bought a refurbished electronic device, I think I would be getting good value for the money I spend. | 3.59 | .864 | 0.445 | <.001 |
H4e | I feel that acquiring a refurbished electronic device meets both my quality and price requirement. | 3.41 | .948 | 0.554 | <.001 |
*Five-point Likert scale with 1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree, n=172, SD = standard deviation, r = correlation coefficient, p = p-value).
Hypothesis testing: When it comes to young consumers in the Netherlands, there is an association between their perceptions of likeliness to purchase refurbished electronic devices in the near future and
H1: their perceptions of the overall environmental awareness. The Pearson correlation coefficient test was used to assess the relationship between the variables in H1 (from H1a to H1f). According to the test results, there was a (medium to high) positive correlation between the likeliness to purchase REDs in the near future and the variables in H1. H1 is generally supported, as the relationship is positive these variables tend to increase together, see column ‘r’ in Table 1.
H2: their perceptions of the social acceptance of these devices. The Pearson correlation coefficient test results indicate that H2 is not generally supported as the relationship is not significantly positive for all statements. Only the likeliness to purchase the REDs in the near future and the social acceptance of people nearby, e.g., friends and family, are positively correlated, meaning that these variables tend to increase together, see column ‘r’ in Table 1.
H3: their perceptions of the importance of seller reputation as well as the availability of the product. The Pearson correlation coefficient test revealed that H3 is not generally supported as the relationship is not significantly positive for all statements. Only the likeliness to purchase the REDs in the near future and the perceived seller and manufacturer reputation are positively correlated, meaning that these variables tend to increase together, see column ‘r’ in Table 1.
H4: their perceptions of the affordability and value of these devices. The Pearson correlation coefficient test disclosed a positive correlation between the likeliness to purchase REDs in the near future and those of H4 (from H4a to H4e). H4 is generally supported, as the relationship is positive these variables tend to increase together, see column ‘r’ in Table 1.
The first hypothesis (H1) asserts that there is a significant relationship between the young consumers likeliness to purchase REDs and their environmental awareness level. In other words, if the young consumer’s environmental awareness level increase, their likeliness to purchase REDs will also increase. This result conforming to Aktar et al. (2014); Nasiri and Shokouhyar (2021); Nguyen et al. (2019); and Yin et al. (2014) argument where citizens in general are more willing to consider and purchase refurbished electronic products when their level of environmental awareness is high.
The findings from the second hypothesis (H2a, H2b, H2c and H2d) disclose that peers like family members, friends and colleagues could positively influence our young consumers to consider REDs. This result is encouraging as it can be used as a solid evident of why marketers of refurbished goods should consider using work of mouth (WOM) and opinion leader to help them reach new audiences and build a positive brand reputation. Additionally, this result also adds credibility to the findings of Agostini et al. (2021); Islam et al. (2021); and Nguyen et al. (2019) that friends and family members are always an important factor behind purchase decisions of e-waste products.
One of the critical research findings is that the young Dutch consumers reveal that making REDs available in multiple channels (including online) will not encourage them to consider REDs (see H3e and H3f). This finding is an opposite from what we have learnt from the past research where location convenience is one of main factors positively affect attitude and the intention to purchase refurbished products (Agostini et al., 2021; Yin et al., 2014). Perhaps, more research (such as in-depth interview) should be conducted in order to understand why location ‘is’ or ‘is not’ important from the young consumer’s viewpoint.
The fourth hypothesis findings establish a significant relationship between the likeliness to purchase REDs and the affordability and value of owning REDs. This result agrees with a study focused on different factors in consumer perceived value about purchasing refurbished mobile phones by Nasiri and Shokouhyar (2021). However, this result is not surprising considering that majority of the respondents in this research are not a ‘high income owner’ (for e.g., over 84.9% of these young consumers claimed that their monthly income is within or less than €1000).
When considering the development of (new) business models for refurbished electronic devices, these findings bring useful suggestions for designing the different business model dimensions, i.e., Value Proposition, Value Delivery, Value Capture and Value Creation (Lüdeke-Freund et al., 2019). For the Value Proposition, the key message in the offering should focus on the quality and price of REDs as fitting the young consumers’ needs and purchasing power. Secondly, the offering should stress the environmental benefit that REDs bring over new devices as the young consumers interested in buying REDs are found to place considerable value on buying environmentally aware. Regarding the Value Delivery dimension, sales channels that stimulate peers to positively influence awareness on REDs will support purchase intend with young consumers.
There is a growing stream of electronic and electric waste (e-waste). As a strategy to reduce or slow-down this waste stream refurbishing may be considered. This paper examined young consumers’ purchase intention of refurbished electronic devices (REDs) such as laptop, tablet, mobile phone and game console. The results shed light on what young consumers value and find important when it comes to decisions on purchasing refurbished electronic devices in the near future.
From a literature review the factors that influence young consumers’ purchase intention were identified as ‘environmental awareness’, ‘social acceptance’, ‘seller/brand reputation and availability’, and ‘affordability and value’. For each factor several statements were developed and used as independent variables in a questionnaire. For purchase intention, the dependent variable, one statement was added. In total 172 young consumers filled out the survey, i.e., students from a university in the east of the Netherlands. A correlation analysis revealed a clear positive correlation of the factors ‘environmental awareness’ and ‘affordability and value’ with the intention to purchase REDs. For the factors ‘social acceptance’ and ‘seller/brand reputation and availability’ this is not the case. For ‘social acceptance’ a positive correlation was found for nearby persons, like friends or family, with influence on young consumers. However, for media or government policies no such correlation was observed. For ‘seller/brand reputation and availability’, indeed perceived reputation was found to be positively correlated with purchase intention, but this was not found for availability.
This knowledge about young consumers’ perceptions of value and benefits of refurbished electronic devices can inform the design of innovative value propositions and new circular business models based on re-use strategies. This can also be used to better align the value chains and business models for e-waste management that provide such propositions.
This study is subject to some limitations, providing new directions for further studies. First, the survey was conducted over a relatively short period (four weeks), so the sample size may be restricted. If there had been more time, more respondents might have completed the survey (Hair et al., 2021; Ho, 2019). Second, the quantitative method used in this study might be a limitation as well. Surveys are good tools for building a general understanding of certain topics, but they cannot go into further detail because every respondent completes the same set of questions. Diving deeper into the reasoning behind the young people’s responses would require qualitative approaches, such as focus groups or in-depth interviews.
As this was just a first-stage study, the authors limited the investigation to the young consumers of a single university in the east of the Netherlands. In future research, it would be interesting to build on this by undertaking parallel studies at other higher education institutions, both inside and outside of the Netherlands, to compare the results and identify differences in approach. Future research may also be conducted through the lens of the theory of planned behaviour (TPB), which is widely accepted and looks at other dimensions such as how personal beliefs and attitudes influence purchase intentions and behaviour.
Agostini, L., Bigliardi, B., Filippelli, S., & Galati, F. (2021) Seller reputation, distribution and intention to purchase refurbished products, Journal of Cleaner Production, 316. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128296
Akhtar, R., Masud, M.M., & Afroz, R. (2014) Household perception and recycling behaviour on electronic waste management: a case study of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Malaysian Journal of Science, 33(1), 32-41.
Hair, J.F., Celsi, W.C., Ortinau, D.J., and Bush, R.P. (2021) Essentials of Marketing Research, 4th edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Ho, H.W.L. (2019) “How Can We Serve You Better: Customers’ Perceptions of Services and Facilities Offered in a Community Library”, Library Leadership & Management, 33(3). Available at: https://doi.org/10.5860/llm.v33i3.7353
Islam, M.T., Huda, N., Baumber, A., Shumon, R., Zaman, A., Ali, F., Hossain, & R., Sahajwalla, A. (2021) A global review of consumer behavior towards e-waste and implications for the circular economy, Journal of Cleaner Production, 316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128297
Jonker, J., Faber, N., & Haaker, T. (2022) Quick scan circular business models: inspiration for organising value retention in loops. Ministerie van Economische Zaken en Klimaat. https://circulairemaakindustrie.nl/documenten/quick-scan-cbm/
Kumar, A. (2019) Exploring young adults’ e-waste recycling behaviour using an extended theory of planned behaviour model: a cross-cultural study, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 141, 378-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.013
Lüdeke‐Freund, F., Gold, S., and Bocken, N.M. (2019) ‘A review and typology of circular economy business model patterns’, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 23(1), pp. 36-61. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12763
Nasiri, M.N., & Shokouhyar, S. (2021) Actual consumers' response to purchase refurbished smartphones: exploring perceived value from product reviews in online retailing, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102652
Nguyen, H.T.T., Hung R.J., Lee, C.H., & Nguyen, H.T.T. (2019) Determinants of residents’ e-waste recycling behavioral intention: a case study from Vietnam, Sustainability, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010164
United Nations Institute for Training and Research. (2020) The Global E-waste Monitor 2020 – Quantities, flows, and the circular economy potential. Available from: https://ewastemonitor.info/gem-2020/ [Accessed 31st January 2023].
Yin, J., Gao, Y., & Xu H. (2014) Survey and analysis of consumers' behaviour of waste mobile phone recycling in China, Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 517-525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.00